Reports & Publications

NetScreen Technologies, Inc. Netscreen 5200 versus Nokia IP740 and Cisco Systems PIX 535 Competitive Evaluation of Multi-Gigabit Firewall/VPN Multifunction Devices

Sponsor: NetScreen Technologies, Inc (Juniper)
NetScreen 5200 versus Nokia IP740 and Cisco PIX 535 Evaluation of Multi-Gig Firewall/VPN Devices

Abstract

Tolly Group Report #202121 (March 2002) benchmarks the NetScreen-5200 multi-gigabit firewall/VPN against Cisco PIX 535 and Nokia IP740, using zero-loss (<0.001% packet loss) Gigabit-Ethernet tests for firewall, IPSec VPN and latency.


Firewall throughput and scale

  • NetScreen-5200 sustains 4 Gbit/s bidirectional firewall throughput and 2 Gbit/s at 64-byte packets with 100 000 sessions, outperforming PIX 535 by 26 × and IP740 by 17 ×.

  • At 500 000 sessions the platform remains wire-speed on most frame sizes and still forwards 1.4 Gbit/s (70% line rate) for 64-byte traffic; Cisco could not reach 500 000 sessions and Nokia’s ceiling was lower.


VPN performance

  • Across a single IPSec 3DES/SHA-1 tunnel NetScreen-5200 delivers 700 Mbit/s at 64-byte packets (24 × PIX 535) and scales to 1.93 Gbit/s (96.6% line rate) at 1 400-byte packets, while PIX 535 tops out at 110 Mbit/s.

  • Accounting for IPSec overhead, NetScreen still moves 56% of theoretical bandwidth with 64-byte packets versus PIX 535’s 2%.


Latency

  • Firewall latency is 6.5 µs for 64-byte frames—57 % below PIX 535 and 65 % below IP740—and remains lower across larger packets.

  • VPN latency is 20 µs at 64 bytes, 93 % lower than PIX 535; the advantage persists up to 1 400-byte packets (66 % lower).


Key takeaways


NetScreen-5200 combines multi-gigabit firewalling, high-speed IPSec, sub-10 µs firewall latency and carrier-class session scale while competitors lose throughput or fail to scale. These results position it as a robust choice for enterprises and service providers that need predictable, low-latency security services at gigabit rates without performance trade-offs.